Ryan Harrison My blog, portfolio and technology related ramblings

Make HTTP Requests in Kotlin

These days making HTTP requests in any language is a staple of many common workflows and features. This post will go through a few of the methods in which you can make such requests in Kotlin using some of the great open source libraries available.

Fuel

Probably the most commonly used library for this requirement, Fuel is fully featured and stable for any such use case. The default settings used are also good so it requires very little/if any configuration to get up and running.

The base of the library sits on extension functions of String - which in this case represent URL. This makes the interface very fluent any easy to read.

Fuel also makes use of the Result library - written by the same creator - to bundle up error conditions and responses. This does mean another dependency to add, but it makes error handling a bit easier. The recommended method is done through a when expression:

"http://httpbin.org/get".httpGet().responseString { request, response, result ->
  when (result) {
    is Result.Failure -> {
      val ex = result.getException()
    }
    is Result.Success -> {
      val data = result.get()
    }
  }
}

The underlying requests are performed on a dedicated thread pool making the library capable of both blocking and asynchronous requests.

You can also perform synchronous requests if you want:

val (request, response, result) = "http://httpbin.org/get".httpGet().responseString() // result is Result<String, FuelError>

Take a look at the docs to find examples of how to use authentication, POST etc requests, parameters support, and timeouts etc. The API is configured in a fluent manner:

"http://httpbin.org/get".httpGet().timeout(timeout).timeoutRead(timeoutRead).responseString { request, response, result -> }

Ktor Client

Another approach is to make use of the newer Ktor library. Although the main focus has been on the server-side area, it also includes another package to perform non-blocking requests in a similar fashion. As Ktor is based around Kotlin coroutines, this perhaps makes most sense if you are more familiar/are already using them in your project.

Ktor includes multiple methods of requests. The main being Apache, but CIO (Coroutine IO) and Jetty handlers are also available. Configuration is done through a fluent, builder-like API very similar to that used in the Ktor server packages.

val client = HttpClient(Apache) {
    install(JsonFeature) {
        serializer = GsonSerializer()
    }
}
val htmlContent = client.get<String>("https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page")

Note that in this case, get is a suspending function so you would have to call it within a coroutine. Using runBlocking or async are the most suitable candidates and means that, unlike Fuel, you have complete control over which thread pool is used for the requests.

suspend fun parallelRequests() {
    val client = HttpClient(Apache)
    
    // Start two requests asynchronously.
    val req1 = async { client.call("https://127.0.0.1:8080/a").response.readBytes() }
    val req2 = async { client.call("https://127.0.0.1:8080/b").response.readBytes() }
    
    // Get the request contents without blocking threads, but suspending the function until both
    // requests are done.
    val bytes1 = req1.await() // Suspension point.
    val bytes2 = req2.await() // Suspension point.
}

The Apache engine is based on Apache HTTPComponents and supports the widest variety of config options. It is also the only engine to support redirects and HTTP/2. It will bring in apache as a dependency though. The CIO engine is more basic but has no extra dependencies.

Much like you would expect from any HTTP library, you can configure cookies, authentication, timeouts etc as needed.

Native URL

If you don’t want to use a dedicated library, don’t want to do any custom configuration, then Kotlin includes a nice extension method on the URL class to perform GET requests via opening a stream.

val response = try {
        URL("http://google.co.uk")
                .openStream()
                .bufferedReader()
                .use { it.readText() }

Other notable mentions include:

khttp library

natively using HttpURLConnection as you would in Java

Read More

Favourite Kotlin Features

Kotlin has many great language features which, in my view, put it way ahead of Java in terms of expressiveness and overall productivity. Here are a few of the notable examples:

Full Java Interop

This is probably the key factor to widespread adoption of Kotlin - and something that most new languages struggle with when trying to gain usage. One of the major design decisions of Kotlin is that it has full compatibility with Java. This isn’t like languages such as Scala or Groovy, which although compile down to the same bytecode and run on the JVM, cannot interact with Java code or make use of libraries written in Java.

When you start a Kotlin project, IntelliJ also probably created a similar Java source folder in the root of your project. This signifies a key point in that you can have both Kotlin and Java code right in the same project, talking to each other and compiling at the same time. No fancy tooling needed, it just works as you would expect. Kotlin supports or has variants for every Java language feature meaning there is full interop between the two.

For example take the following Java class:

public class Foo {
    public void sayInJava(String something) {
        System.out.println("Said in Java: " + something);
    }
}

Maybe this is in a library .jar file somewhere and just referenced in your project. In Kotlin you can call the Java code just like you would your Kotlin code:

fun say() {
    val foo = Foo()
    foo.sayInJava("from Kotlin")
}

This is cool and all, but the great thing about this is that from day one Kotlin has fantastic 3rd party library support. Everyone knows that there is pretty much a library for everything in Java-land - well you get to use each and every one of those in your Kotlin code for free. This massively lowers the barrier to entry for Kotlin compared to so many other languages when you have extremely stable libraries at your disposal:

  • Apache commons and all the rest of them
  • Guava, collections etc
  • Kafka, ElasticSearch, Hadoop etc
  • Spring Framework (which now has first class Kotlin support)
  • Hibernate, JooQ
  • Logback, Log4j, AssertJ, Hamcrest
  • The list goes on, and this doesn’t even include Kotlin specific libraries!

This feature also means that you don’t have to go head first into Kotlin for new or existing projects. There are a lot of developers on larger systems who have begun migrating over data classes and tests to Kotlin, leaving the core business logic in Java. That’s perfectly feasible and probably recommended to keep it slow and appease those who are less than emphatic about using a new language.

Data Classes

Probably one of the headline features in Kotlin - and it really does save you so much boilerplate. In Java, writing basic POJO classes is easy, but requires tons of boilerplate, even if the IDE can generate it for you. It litters up your codebase and makes your classes unnecessarily long and unreadable. For example a basic data class in Java could look like:

public class Person {
    private String name;
    private int age;
    
    public Person(String name, int age) {
        this.name = name;
        this.age = age;
    }
    
    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }
     
    // other getters and setters
   
    // equals and hashcode generated
    
    // generated toString()
    
    // clone/copy method
}

That’s a massive amount of code just to define a simple Person with a couple attributes. In Kotlin however, we can do it in one line:

data class Person(val name: String, val age: Int)

This one line is equivalent to all that code above. The data keyword will instruct the compiler to generate the following for all attributes:

  • constructor to set all attributes (in this case they are val so are immutable)
  • getters (optional setters if var) for all attributes - implemented as Kotlin properties
  • equals and hashcode methods
  • toString method
  • copy() method similar to cloning in Java

Extension Functions

This is another key feature of Kotlin that puts it above a lot of the competition. Similarly to C# (just with additional benefits) you can add your own methods and properties to classes without modifying their actual definition. The most common case is where you don’t have access to the source of the target class (e.g String or Int), but want to keep the nicer syntax of operating directly on the object. For example, take the method countMatches of Apache Commons Lang:

Java

int count = StringUtils.countMatches("some string", "s");

Kotlin

In Kotlin we can define an extension function which simply delegates down:

fun String.countMatches(s: String) = StringUtils.countMatches(this, s)
// then
val count = "some string".countMatches("s")

A simple example, but this concept gets used everywhere within the Kotlin standard library e.g:

public fun CharSequence.lineSequence(): Sequence<String> = splitToSequence("\r\n", "\n", "\r")

public fun CharSequence.lastIndexOfAny(strings: Collection<String>, startIndex: Int, ignoreCase: Boolean): Int = findAnyOf(strings, startIndex, ignoreCase, last = true)?.first ?: -1

Extension functions in Kotlin are really nothing more than compiler magic. If you look at the bytecode level, they are nothing more than static functions which take this as a first param (really just like every other method). The Kotlin compiler just allows us to use this nicer syntax in order to call such functions. Or the really handy one to convert a Java Stream to a list without going through the verbosity of .collect(Collectors.toList()):

public fun <T> Stream<T>.toList(): List<T> = collect(Collectors.toList<T>())

If that’s not a reason to like extension functions, I don’t know what is.

This is similar behaviour to how extension functions work in C#, but in Kotlin there is another way they can be used - as parameters to functions. Take the commonly used apply function as defined below. This can operate on any T (any object) and takes in one function as a parameter. This is no normal function though - it’s an extension function of T (the class it operates on).

fun <T> T.apply(block: T.() -> Unit): T {
    block()
    return this
}

This has a very cool advantage in that the scope of the function is local to the class - e.g you have access to all the members:

val person = Person().apply {
    firstName = "Bill"
    secondName = "Smith"
    age = calculateAge()
}

A somewhat simple example, but it provides a really nice syntax for the builder pattern as described in this article. And it gets used all over the place in newer Kotlin libraries. Take a route definition in Ktor for example (take a look at this post on how to get started with Ktor):

route("/widget") {
	get("/") {
    	call.respond(widgetService.getAllWidgets())
	}
}

The route function itself is an extension function of the Route class and so we have access to other builders on top of the Route - in this case get which adds an interceptor. get itself takes in an extension function as a lambda which is how it is able to get a handle on the call variable amongst others.

String Templating

A simple one, but very useful. Gone are the days of concatenating a bunch of small strings and variables together using + in Java, instead we can just use a template:

Java

System.out.println("A = " + a + ", B = " + b + "C = " + c)

Kotlin

println("A = $a, B = $b, C = $c")

You can also directly call methods on the referenced variables:

println("Result is ${res.getResult()}")

And More

This post as gotten quite long so there are still plenty of other points I want to mention in a part 2.

Read More

Logging in Kotlin

If you’re coming into Kotlin from Java-land, you’re probably very familiar with the below statement which creates a static reference to a SLF4J logger for the current class:

private static final logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Something.class);

Even though you can of course use SLF4J in Kotlin, you can’t use the above statement to create one due to the way that Kotlin handles static. Here are a couple options and workarounds for logging in Kotlin:

Instance Variable

class Something {
    val logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Something::class.java)
}

This will work, but doesn’t look like idiomatic Kotlin to me. For starters, you are referencing both the Logger and LoggerFactory alongside the Java version of the target class. There is also the bigger problem of the fact that this will create a new logger for each instance of Something - not very efficient at all in certain cases.

Companion Object

To clean this up a bit we can make use of companion objects in Kotlin to get the same static behaviour:

class Something {
    companion object {
        val logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Something::class.java)
    }
}

This will get you most of the way there, but we can do better by extracting out a factory function to create the logger for us:

Factory Function

inline fun <reified T> loggerFor(): Logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(T::class.java)

Usage

class Something {
    companion object {
        val logger = loggerFor<Something>()
    }
}

In my opinion this isn’t that great either as I have to generate and use a companion object for every class that just needs logging. That’s even more verbose than Java! There is also the issue that companion objects are actually really quite heavyweight constructs - nowhere near as clear-cut as a simple static variable in Java. This great article explains how they are working behind the scenes.

Extension Function

If you want, you can also get around having to pass in the class name as the generic parameter using an extension function:

inline fun <reified T> T.logger(): Logger { return LoggerFactory.getLogger(T::class.java) } 

Usage

class Something {
    companion object {
        val logger = logger()
    }
}

The bad news with this approach is that in your logs the source class will actually show up as the companion object, not the actual class itself. You can around this with some logic in the factory function:

Removing Companion Object

inline fun <reified T> T.logger(): Logger {
    if (T::class.isCompanion) {
        return LoggerFactory.getLogger(T::class.java.enclosingClass)
    }
    return LoggerFactory.getLogger(T::class.java)
}

Top-Level Variable - My Favourite

My personal favourite is to define the logger as a private top level variable within the same file as the target class. You can make use of the above factory function to make it very simple without having to worry about companion objects at all:

private val logger = loggerFor<DatabaseFactory>()

class DatabaseFactory {
    // use in here
}

You’re not making mess in the global scope because the logger is private to this file, and no companion object!

Kotlin-Logging Library

If none of these approaches suit your needs, there is a dedicated logging framework for Kotlin which handles this in a neat approach:

private val logger = KotlinLogging.logger {} 
class Something {
    // use in here
}

This library makes clever use of a lambda as a way to get a handle on the enclosing class name. It also does a similar thing as described above to remove the companion class when needed. Personally however, I see little benefits to introducing yet another logging library for these benefits (it also provides some Kotlin friendly features around lambdas and lazy logging). With this I would end up with SLF4J, Logback/Log4J and now kotlin-logging.

Why no static keyword?

No idea. It’s one of the very few annoyances that I have with Kotlin in that it’s way too difficult to define static variables. Companion objects are there, but that’s a lot of boilerplate and overhead when you just want a simple static variable like a logger.

There is also the @JVMStatic issue, as variables inside companion objects aren’t actually static by default as seen by the JVM. They just act that way due to their singleton nature.

I wish JetBrains would either add a proper static keyword or make it easier to define companion variables without a complete object. Something like:

companion val logger = loggerFor<Something>()

Which could automatically translate into a companion object with the variable inside. It’s not perfect, but saves me some boilerplate.

Read More

Faster Java Startup Times

Although Java is considered to be very performant in general, the startup times aren’t particularly great. All things taken into account, this isn’t particularly surprising when you factor in everything that happens when you start a Java program - VM creation, class loading, JIT compilation etc.

For small projects or utility programs this isn’t too much of a problem, but for larger projects with a very big classpath, this can become quite annoying during development. For Spring Boot apps in particular, even though the development process is very quick, startup times can become large when you start adding a lot of dependencies.

VM Arguments

Here are a couple of VM args which you can add to speed up startup times.

NOTE - This is for development only to improve app restarts etc. This is absolutely not recommended in production environments

-Xverify:none

This option disables JVM bytecode verification during startup and is perhaps the most significant source of improvement. When enabled, the JVM will check your code for certain dangerous and disallowed behaviour. Obviously, by not performing such checks, the JVM startup time will be improved. Again, you should definitely not do this in a production environment, even if you trust all the code you are running.

-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1

This option tells the JVM to stop optimising your code after the first level. The JVM has three tiers of intermediate compilation. Here we are preventing any further incremental compilation after the first level, meaning that your system has slightly more resources to use elsewhere rather than optimising your code. Again, this could potentially decrease performance so isn’t recommended in production. You can read more about compilation in HotSpot in this presentation deck.

I created a simple Spring Boot app with an in-memory H2 database and a couple REST endpoints to test the difference in startup times with and without these JVM args (not that this project includes a lot of extra dependencies such as actuator, JPA, caching to reflect a standard Spring App with a large classpath):

Startup Mode Startup Time
Run inside IDE with no custom arguments 9.8s
Run inside IDE with -Xverify:none -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 6.2s
  +37%

That’s quite a massive 37% improvement in startup times just with some simple VM args!

Spring Boot Specifics

Aside from these magic VM args, there are a few things to take into account when building standard Spring applications that really impact startup performance:

  • Spring projects are generally a magnet for massive classpaths. Look at your dependency list in a Spring Boot project and there are probably hundreds of .jar files and thousands of classes to load. No wonder why disabling bytecode verification can improve times so dramatically. Try to limit the amount of libraries you are bringing in and think carefully about whether you need another dependency before you just adding it to your project. Try not to end up like a Node project where half the internet is in your node_modules directory.
  • Component scanning can be slow. This is one killer feature of the Spring framework, but as I mentioned above, if your classpath is massive then it’s going to take time to run through all those classes. Try to limit the packages that are scanned or maybe consider splitting your project up. You can also make use of the @Lazy annotation to prevent @Beans from being immediately created/loaded.
  • Doing database migrations at startup. No surprise that this is going to cause some slowdown. If you are using Liquibase for migrations, the JHipster project has a nice AsyncSpringLiquibase class that prevents blocking whilst migrations are taking place.
  • Initialising caches. This may significantly improve performance when the app is live, but when you have a lot of Ehcaches it can take a whilst to init them all at startup. In your local environment consider turning some of them off, or doing this lazily.
Read More

RESTful Kotlin with Ktor and Exposed

I’ve been writing a lot more Kotlin recently and have been really liking the language so far. I’ll probably write another post pointing out some of my favourite features, but in short it’s basically Java, but without all the annoying stuff. I think in terms of adoption it’s still very early days for Kotlin, but due to the great interop with Java and being an official language for Android development, I wouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t start to become extremely popular over the next few years.

Kotlin is pretty versatile, even though most people no doubt focus on the Android side of things. That doesn’t mean however that server side development isn’t also supported - in fact, quite the opposite. The Spring framework already has built-in support for Kotlin and many other libraries are also focusing attention on it. You could use such Java focused libraries, but instead you could use the dedicated Kotlin libraries - some of which are supported by JetBrains themselves.

All the code for the following example is available in the GitHub project kotlin-ktor-exposed-starter.

Create a Kotlin Project

First things first on our way to creating a barebones REST server in Kotlin. Open up IntelliJ and create a new Kotlin project. This will create the basic file structure and a gradle build file. To make sure everything is working, you can run the basic Hello World:

fun main(args: Array<String>) {
    println("Hello World!")
}

Setting up Ktor Async Web Framework

Ktor is great library for creating simplistic and lightweight web services in Kotlin. It’s completely asynchronous through the use of coroutines and as such should scale very well with load. It’s still in active development so might have some rough edges, but on the whole it seems solid. The documentation is somewhat lacking, but has improved significantly. Also note that it’s not at v1.0 yet so the API is no doubt subject to change.

Add the following to build.gradle to add ktor as a dependency and allow the use of kotlin coroutines (an experimental feature as of writing). We are also using Jackson as out library of choice for JSON conversions (GSON support is also available).

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
    maven { url "https://dl.bintray.com/kotlin/kotlinx" }
    maven { url "https://dl.bintray.com/kotlin/ktor" }
}

kotlin {
    experimental {
        coroutines "enable"
    }
}

dependencies {
    compile "io.ktor:ktor-server-netty:$ktor_version"
    compile "io.ktor:ktor-jackson:$ktor_version"
}

In this case, we’re making use of the Netty application server, although servlet based options are also available (although not sure why you would want to sacrifice async).

Create a Ktor application

The main configuration for a ktor app (module) is very straightforward:

fun Application.module() {
    install(DefaultHeaders)
    install(CallLogging)
    install(ContentNegotiation) {
        jackson {
            configure(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT, true)
        }
    }

    install(Routing) {
        widget(WidgetService())
    }
}

fun main(args: Array<String>) {
    embeddedServer(Netty, 8080, watchPaths = listOf("MainKt"), module = Application::module).start()
}

Here a new Ktor module is created. Ktor is configured around the concept of features which can be installed into the main request pipeline. In this example we add features to add default headers to all our responses, log our calls for debugging and also configure processing of JSON requests and conversion to responses. Finally, the main Routing feature is used to designate which paths to handle in our app. We defer to another extension method defined elsewhere to define the routes for a widget RESTful service. To run the application, the main method starts a Netty server pointing to the module we just created.

Of course for anything to actually happen, we need to define the widget routes and service.

Defining Routes

Here is the definition of the widget extension method which defines the interface for our service:

fun Route.widget(widgetService: WidgetService) {

    route("/widget") {

        get("/") {
            call.respond(widgetService.getAllWidgets())
        }

        get("/{id}") {
            val widget = widgetService.getWidget(call.parameters["id"]?.toInt()!!)
            if (widget == null) call.respond(HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
            else call.respond(widget)
        }

        post("/") {
            val widget = call.receive<NewWidget>()
            call.respond(widgetService.addWidget(widget))
        }

        put("/") {
            val widget = call.receive<NewWidget>()
            call.respond(widgetService.updateWidget(widget))
        }

        delete("/{id}") {
            val removed = widgetService.deleteWidget(call.parameters["id"]?.toInt()!!)
            if (removed) call.respond(HttpStatusCode.OK)
            else call.respond(HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
        }

    }
}

As you can see the Ktor DSL is very intuitive thanks mainly to extension methods and lambda parameter syntax in Kotlin. The basic HTTP method are defined for dealing with widgets - each of which defer to our service which can do all the database access etc.

Note that the post and put methods expect an instance of the NewWidget class (as converted via JSON). This is defined as a Kotlin data class for a widget instance with an optional id:

data class NewWidget(
        val id: Int?,
        val name: String,
        val quantity: Int,
        val dateCreated: Long
)

As we have set up Jackson before, we can just return a basic kotlin data object and it will be converted to json without any additional work from us. Finally, we need to create the widget service to handle the logic of saving and retrieving our model.

Setting up Exposed

Exposed is another JetBrains sponsored library for database interactions in Kotlin. It is a kind of ORM, but unlike Hibernate it’s very simple and lightweight. In this post we’re going to use H2 as a simple in-memory database and HikariCP for connection pooling. Add the following dependencies:

compile "com.h2database:h2:$h2_version"
compile "org.jetbrains.exposed:exposed:$exposed_version"
compile 'com.zaxxer:HikariCP:2.7.8'

Exposed has two ways of interacting with databases - their DSL and DAO. In this post I focus only on the DSL (sql builder) as I think that’s where the library excels. The DAO syntax is nice, but introduces complexity when dealing with web frameworks as you have to convert to your own model class manually. The following defines a Table for widgets:

object Widgets : Table() {
    val id = integer("id").primaryKey().autoIncrement()
    val name = varchar("name", 255)
    val quantity = integer("quantity")
    val dateCreated = long("dateCreated")
}

It’s quite straightforward, we just define our columns as fields and use the fluent column builder to define attributes. We can then make use of the Widgets object application wide to query the table.

Connection Pooling and Database Threads

Now we can setup a connection pool for database interaction. This example uses HikariCP as it’s the most widely used library for this at the moment:

private fun hikari(): HikariDataSource {
    val config = HikariConfig()
    config.driverClassName = "org.h2.Driver"
    config.jdbcUrl = "jdbc:h2:mem:test"
    config.maximumPoolSize = 3
    config.isAutoCommit = false
    config.transactionIsolation = "TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ"
    config.validate()
    return HikariDataSource(config)
}

Now we can tell Exposed to connect to our H2 db and create the widgets table:

Database.connect(hikari())
transaction {
    create(Widgets)
}

A key thing to note when dealing with the async world is that you really don’t want to block any of the threads that are handling web requests. Unlike the standard servlet model where each request is tied to a thread, when you block in an async app you are essentially also blocking any other work from being done. If you do this a lot or have a spike in load, your app will grind to a halt.

This presents a problem when using standard JDBC to query our database because the framework is inherently blocking and so our threads will cease when waiting for results sets. To get around this, we must do our database queries on a dedicated thread pool. This is only really possible through coroutines which can suspend and resume as needed. The flow will be:

  1. Coroutine A starts to handle main web request from user
  2. Database query needed so another coroutine B is starting on another thread pool to perform this blocking operation
  3. A suspends execution until B is finished. Due to the nature of coroutines, the underlying thread is then free to perform other work (handling other requests)
  4. Background coroutine B finishes after database query. Thread is returned to the thread pool for other queries etc
  5. A resumes execution by restoring the previous state it had before suspension. It now has access to the query results which can be passed back as the response. Note that the coroutine A may now be executing on a different thread than in step 1 (pretty cool right?)

This might sound like a lot of work (and it is), but thanks to the coroutines library in Kotlin, this is thankfully very easy to accomplish. First, we need to create the dedicated thread pool for database queries. This takes the form of a coroutine context:

val dispatcher: CoroutineContext = newFixedThreadPoolContext(5, "database-pool")

Now we can also define a helper method to execute queries on this pool:

suspend fun <T> dbQuery(block: () -> T): T =
    withContext(dispatcher) {
        transaction { block() }
    }
}

The method is marked as suspend which will allow the suspension of A described in step 3.

Database Queries with Exposed

Finally, we need to define the WidgetService which will be making use of the database we just set up. The whole code is available in the GitHub project, but here is the method to retrieve a specific widget:

suspend fun getWidget(id: Int): Widget? = dbQuery {
        Widgets.select {
            (Widgets.id eq id)
        }.mapNotNull { toWidget(it) }
                .singleOrNull()
    }

As you can see we make use of the dbQuery helper to perform our query. The Exposed DSL for queries is nice and easy to read. The result of the select is a ResultRow, so I define a helper to perform the mapping to our model class:

private fun toWidget(row: ResultRow): Widget =
            Widget(
                    id = row[Widgets.id],
                    name = row[Widgets.name],
                    quantity = row[Widgets.quantity],
                    dateCreated = row[Widgets.dateCreated]
            )

Something like Hibernate (or the DAO in Exposed) would do this automatically, but Exposed is just a lightweight wrapper around the sql so we have full control of what’s happening. Here is the method to add and delete a widget - again fairly intuitive to read:

suspend fun addWidget(widget: NewWidget): Widget {
        var key: Int? = 0
        dbQuery {
            key = Widgets.insert({
                it[name] = widget.name
                it[quantity] = widget.quantity
                it[dateCreated] = System.currentTimeMillis()
            }) get Widgets.id
        }
        return getWidget(key!!)!!
    }


suspend fun deleteWidget(id: Int): Boolean = dbQuery {
        Widgets.deleteWhere { Widgets.id eq id } > 0
    }

And that’s it! Pretty straightforward in terms of lines of code to create a REST server with database interaction. Start the app as you would any other program (no need to deploy to any app server) and test out the widget routes.

The full example is available in the GitHub project kotlin-ktor-exposed-starter.

Read More